Bittensor 日报｜2026年11月1日

起点 · 12:15 UTC

一位成员报告称sn82 emissions already off btw，并将悬而未决的问题重新表述为需要some public criteria for when the switch gets flipped so we dont repeat this。

反驳 · 12:29 UTC

另一位成员反对将规则成文化：once we start getting into all the specific details, it becomes an endless cycle: people find ways around the rules, then the rules get stricter to stop them, then they find new loopholes, and the rules just keep getting more and more complicated, 并得出结论that's why I think it's better to just not have specific criteria。

起点 · 15:20–15:21 UTC

被问及是否存在完美的激励机制时，一位成员表示I can't find any perfect IM，并补充道There's always an opportunity to exploit。

重构 · 15:22 UTC

另一位成员认为这正是设计使然：incentivized to find exploits, owner and other miners incentivized to fix, network working as intended, 并补充说这only breaks if owner is corrupt or can't fix, and sometimes the IM is so cooked its going to fail regardless。

反驳 · 15:22–15:24 UTC

第一位成员将这套逻辑反过来用在研究类 subnet 上：That's why most of the subnets failed, no? 以及no research subnet has succeeded so far. there's no proof，而对方则让步称研究类 subnet produced intelligence and some research so far, but I would not say any have mainstream success。

结论 · 15:27–15:32 UTC

讨论最终聚焦到 emission 控制权这一决定性因素上：I think if you had 0 control over emission any research subnet is doomed to fail, 另有一位成员补充道new subnets can't succeed without massive revenue from the very beginning(that's already been proven) or crazy support from OGs. so new research subnets need support for long time。