Bittensor Daily Daily digest of the Bittensor ecosystem

SUBNET TRACKER · All subnets

SN117 · everyframe.studio

Every Bittensor Daily mention of SN117 everyframe.studio, newest first. Price changes are snapshots from each edition.

24h change +71.20%

What happened
SN117 (everyframe.studio) promoted Halloween-themed pricing and added the Pika H3 Flex model to its platform, alongside a free-credit signup offer. The team said signups are now in the hundreds but that plans for revenue allocation or token buybacks will only be announced once regular subscription revenue begins.
Community
A community member asked whether EveryFrame is already generating revenue from paying customers and whether a percentage would go toward buying back SN117 Alpha tokens. Other members asked about the team behind the project and discussed potential collaboration.
Official
The team said signups are starting to show traction and that revenue and buyback plans will be addressed once free-period users convert to paid subscriptions.

Read the full edition: In #Rao, the week's long-running SN82 emissions dispute returns and splits over whether publishing fixed criteria would prevent repeat disputes or simply invite new exploits. →

24h change +8.69%

What happened
SN117 (everyframe.studio) team explained the subnet's emission structure after community questions, detailing a 33% owner emission split alongside a reduced validator take and a temporarily reduced miner take. The team said miner rewards are tied to actual product usage rather than emission percentage, and that validators have limited work on the subnet. Separately, the subnet shipped a Friday update adding 11 new models to its Director product, including Kling 4.0 Edit and VEED Dubbing. The team also noted its documentation was outdated and that the subnet now supports 8 providers, up from what was listed.
Community
Multiple community members and a validator pressed the team repeatedly on why owner emissions are set at 33% and what happens to the unallocated share, with one asking whether stakers' allocation follows similar logic. A user flagged outdated documentation limiting providers and asked about team transparency and doxxing; another subnet owner reached out about a potential collaboration.
Official
The team said miner rewards are driven by real usage rather than the emission split, that validator and miner take were reduced due to low current traffic and limited validator workload, and that documentation referencing 3 providers was outdated, with 8 providers now supported.

Read the full edition: In #Rao, a flare-up over subnet 82's manually toggled emissions revives calls for transparent criteria, while #General logs a bridge-support scam vector and the week's quantum-wallet rollout gets an informal ETA. →