Bittensor Daily Daily digest of the Bittensor ecosystem

SUBNET TRACKER · All subnets

SN107 · Minos

Every Bittensor Daily mention of SN107 Minos, newest first. Price changes are snapshots from each edition.

24h change −1.95%

What happened
A dispute over alleged score-copying among several miners (UIDs 26, 71, 94, and 54) continued over multiple days in the SN107 (Minos) channel, with one side alleging unauthorized database access and the other denying any evidence of cheating. The team separately outlined a roadmap for the rest of the year, including the launch of IM2 and a planned shift of IM1's variant calling from config search to custom algorithms with a new scoring mechanism.
Community
Community members split over the cheating allegations, with some defending the accused miners and demanding specifics on the alleged mechanism, while others insisted the matching scores were suspicious. No evidence was confirmed by either side, and the exchange grew personal at times.
Official
The team said it plans to finish config search across all 22 chromosomes within the next month or so, then move IM1's variant calling to custom algorithms with a new scoring mechanism, alongside the launch of IM2 and a gradual increase in its emissions share.

Read the full edition: SN92 (Reax) to Rework Champion-Selection Logic After Failure-Counter Bug Surfaces →

24h change −1.30%

What happened
Discussion in the SN107 (Minos) channel centered on questions about why certain accounts maintained top mining ranks over extended periods, with some participants noting that multiple UIDs appeared linked to the same group. The owner team addressed the concerns directly, stating it does not control top-ranked miners and pointing to hashing of inputs and truth files as a way for participants to verify submissions were not tampered with. The team also said it is prioritizing release of IM2 for fully agentic mining and plans presentations on the 22nd and 23rd.
Community
Several miners pressed the team for ways to independently verify that top miners' configurations matched what was committed on-chain, with one participant repeatedly questioning whether top ranks were effectively fixed. Other community members pushed back, saying they had looked into the matter themselves and did not find evidence supporting the concerns, while one noted that over 250 hotkeys were receiving emissions.
Official
The team said it is not controlling the top-ranked miners, described ongoing work to add resilience against participants using multiple coldkeys to occupy top slots, and announced it will share further details on X ahead of presentations on the 22nd and 23rd.

Read the full edition: Subtensor Change Moves Root Network's Emission Share to a Live, Per-Block Calculation →